Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.


Microsoft Adds Virtualization Apps to MDOP 2010

Microsoft unveiled two new desktop virtualization applications as part of its bundle of tools for managing Windows 7 deployments.

The new solutions, announced on Monday, include App-V 4.6 (for application virtualization) and Microsoft Enterprise Desktop Virtualization 1.0 Service Pack 1 release candidate (MED-V SP1 RC). Both are part of a collection of six tools for Windows 7 in an updated package called "Microsoft Desktop Optimization Pack 2010" (MDOP 2010).

MDOP is available to Microsoft customers with volume licensing agreements in place -- particularly those who have signed Microsoft's Enterprise Agreement and opted for Software Assurance.

The big news is that MED-V SP1 RC is now supported on Windows 7, both 32-bit and 64-bit versions. Previously, it just supported Windows Vista. Microsoft plans to release the final version of MED-V SP1 in April, but the RC version is available now for general testing through the Microsoft Connect portal.

App-V 4.6 now supports 64-bit Windows client and server operating systems and is available in 11 languages. Microsoft plans to enhance App-V 4.6 by adding support for 13 more languages in April. Existing volume licensing customers can get App-V 4.6 by downloading MDOP 2010 at Microsoft's volume licensing service center. It's also available for testing by Microsoft TechNet and MSDN subscribers.

Microsoft also released terminal server support with App-V for Remote Desktop Services 4.6, which also supports 64-bit systems, available here. App-V for RDS 4.6 consolidates remote host servers and helps avoid application conflicts.

In general, Microsoft has been promoting the use of MDOP tools to overcome application compatibility issues as many organizations weigh the issues when migrating from the venerable 10-year-old Windows XP operating system to Windows 7.

App-V can be used to help resolve app compatibility issues, but it also enables faster installs (with no reboots) and quicker removals of applications, Microsoft officials claim. End users can train on a newer application without IT administrators having to remove the older version. Two different versions of the same application do not conflict on the same desktop when application virtualization is used.

Scott Woodgate, a Microsoft director of product management responsible for Windows, MDOP and desktop strategy, provided a few examples in a telephone interview. He said that the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center has used App-V and found that it took far less time to install an application -- from five days to five minutes.

App-V also adds some benefits when used in conjunction with Microsoft Office 2010, which is currently at the release candidate stage but scheduled for general availability in June. Woodgate claimed that Office 2010 will launch 80 percent faster when deployed using App-V. Also, App-V enables different versions of Office to coexist side by side, including 32-bit and 64-bit versions, he said.

Rather than install an application on a PC, IT pros can use App-V to create a package on the user desktop. The application then streams to the desktop when the user clicks on the package. Woodgate said that Microsoft added "share cache" technology as a new feature with App-V 4.6.

Another reason to use desktop virtualization is to support legacy applications. For instance, a common problem for IT organizations is moving off Internet Explorer 6. It's an aging browser with security issues, but many organizations still use it because of a reliance on custom-built Web-based applications based on IE 6. One solution is to use MED-V to create managed virtual machines. The virtual machines can run the older OS and older browser versions without conflict with Windows 7.

Windows 7 users will also find that neither IE 6 nor IE 7 will run on the OS -- only the IE 8 browser is supported. That's another reason to use MED-V, which allows centralized management of virtualized apps. IT pros in smaller organizations can use Windows 7's XP Mode to run earlier versions of the browser, but XP Mode doesn't allow centralized management and depends on hardware virtualization capabilities being present in the PC's CPU hardware. MED-V does not depend on chip-based hardware virtualization, so it can be run on older PCs.

More information on MED-V SP1 and App-V 4.6 can be found at Microsoft's MDOP blog and Springboard blog.

About the Author

Kurt Mackie is online news editor for the 1105 Enterprise Computing Group.

comments powered by Disqus

Reader Comments:

Fri, Feb 28, 2014

ha, enjoyed your http://u DOT - you sound like someone that knows this first hand :-)@Richard: My view is that virtualization is proving to be an irresistable argument for IT decision makers as they demonstrate cost out in a global economic environment that is hardly 'pucker'. However, my take is that this is just a bridge to when business computing is 'in the cloud'. The primary driver will be cost but it has the somewhat unintentional but convenient side-benefit that an org can blame someone else (assume a reputable someone else) when things go wrong. When I look at what companies like VMware are doing with infrastructure portability (e.g. VMotion) I imagine a near term future where an org dynamically picks up their IT infrastructure from one cloud provider and moves it to another when certain SLA's get breached. From an infosec perspective I agree with Mr Anonymous above - its about standards and audit. But if you've ever tried pen-testing 3rd party webhosting providers you'll know they like to keep the pen-test monkey in the cage (literally!). It will be interesting to see how this plays out...

Tue, Feb 25, 2014

Good to see real expertise on display. Your conioibuttrn is most welcome. [url=]fnmgoysq[/url] [link=]yliejayia[/link]

Tue, Feb 25, 2014

I feel so much happier now I http://r DOT all this. Thanks!

Tue, Feb 25, 2014

that to me few months back. Though virsues & spyware are a real threat in Windows 2008 Hyper-V. We had 10 Windows 2008 Server core servers running Hyper-V. They had been running around 100 production virtual machines for the past 2 and half months beautifully. We were very happy with it as we did not have to pay for it due to the fact plenty of the virtual machines are running Windows 2008 & we had Microsoft Premium support in place. The problem that came up 10 days ago, one virus were able to hit our Windows 2008 Server core servers & render them useless with automatic restart every few minutes. We had antigen in place, but somehow the virus were able to render that useless as well. Though after a hard work for 12 hours with MS Support engineers online we were able to bring our infrastructure back from backup. Though that was 12 hours unplanned downtime (not too long for bringing 100 machines back if compared to physical machines, but still a full setup is down for that long is madness), which our management is not accepting and to be honest it risked our jobs for a moment. If it happen again, then you should expect to see my CV. I believe MS Hyper-V is a beautiful product, though a special kernel not running windows & not being affected by virsues will be great. I am sure VMware & Xen are still affected by some threats , but they are totally immune against virsues, spyware, & trojans. In addition, it seems VMware reduced size version is even had the smallest surface attack. To be honest our management at the moment is considering if VMware cost is reasonable for at least critical virtual machines to avoid further downtime. Please don't get me wrong, I really like Hyper-V & agree being free for Microsoft Shops like us is great. Though the virus scenario we had, I can call it a disaster and would be scared of it being repeated. We are considering a change of anti-virus solution as well. If you are going the Hyper-V route, then get my 2 cents advice of securing your Domain 0 machine as much as possible. Don't connect it to internet. Keep it updated. Ensure that your antivirus solution is the best that you can get. Maybe even put your critical virtual machines on VMware or Xen & the rest on Hyper-V if that is affordable.Good luck & I appreciate ITComparison pointing the security point into their comparison. Its good to have people warned before hand. Although I might still disagree with them on few other points, I will rather e-mail that to them directly.

Tue, Feb 23, 2010 Steve

Your headline is wrong. MDOP previously included those virtualization apps.

Add Your Comment Now:

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Please type the letters/numbers you see above