Dissecting questions and answers for the Windows 2000
Server exam can make you a more confident—and successful—test
taker.
A Little Q&A
Dissecting questions and answers for the Windows 2000
Server exam can make you a more confident—and successful—test
taker.
- By James Carrion
- 08/01/2001
If you’ve already passed your Win2K Professional
exam, you’re probably anxious to tackle the Win2K Server
exam, as you may have heard that the same content you
studied for on the Professional exam will also help you
pass Server. This is true—the Win2K Server exam will test
you on some common Professional topics like OS installation,
hardware installation, driver signing, Active Directory
Group Policy, Security (EFS, auditing), performance monitoring,
printing, backup and restore, OS troubleshooting utilities
and recovery options, Remote Access, and Task scheduling.
In addition, there are also server-specific topics like
DFS, Terminal Services, server upgrades and a lot of disk
management. If that’s not enough, I also suspect Microsoft
is doing a little bit of question-pool borrowing, slipping
questions from the other core exams like Network Infrastructure
and Directory Services into the Server exam. Microsoft
won’t fess up to this, but I have my suspicions that it’s
a way for them to combat the proliferation of Internet
brain dumps.
Question No.1
You want to upgrade a Windows NT Server 4.0 computer named
PEON1 to Windows 2000 Server. PEON1 is currently a member
server in a Windows 2000 domain named ABC.COM. The domain
was recently switched from Mixed to Native mode. You want
to change the role of PEON1 from a member server to an
ABC.COM domain controller.
What should you do? (Choose two.)
- Use Server Manager to promote PEON1 to
the PDC for the ABC.COM domain.
- Reinstall Windows NT Server 4.0 on PEON1
as a BDC in the ABC.COM domain.
- Upgrade PEON1 to Windows 2000 Server.
- Run DCPROMO to install PEON1 as a DC
in the XYZ.COM domain.
- Run the Active Directory Installation
wizard to make PEON1 a domain controller in the ABC.COM.
Question 1 Analysis
At first glance, this question doesn’t look all that difficult,
but a word to the wise—read all the answers before answering
the question. So what’s the problem here? Well, your task
is to make a lowly NT 4.0 member server a Win2K DC. First
notice the current status of PEON1—a member server running
NT 4.0 in a Win2K domain. Is this even possible in a Native
mode Win2K domain? Sure it is, as the decision to switch
from Mixed mode to Native mode only affects the status
of current NT 4.0 DCs (BDCs)—not member servers or workstations.
So there’s nothing wrong with an NT 4.0 member server
in a Native-mode Win2K domain, but NT4.0 BDCs wouldn’t
function in a Native mode domain. If you knew that little
tidbit of knowledge, then you could eliminate answer B.
Let’s go on to the next step in our process
of elimination. Answer A doesn’t make a lot of sense either,
following the same logic we used to eliminate Answer B.
If the Win2K domain is already in Native mode, the NT
4.0 PDC and all NT4.0 BDCs have already been upgraded
to Win2K. Not to mention that Answer A isn’t even technically
feasible, as in NT 4.0 a member server would have had
to be reinstalled from scratch to make it a DC.
OK, now we only need to eliminate one more
answer to narrow down the two remaining correct answers.
Since we may not be sure about what answer C is telling
us just yet, we can set it aside and analyze answers D
and E first. You may have heard of a utility called DCPROMO,
which is used to create a Win2K DC. Did you also know
that its alias is the “Active Directory Installation Wizard?”
If that’s the case, then answers D and E seem to be saying
the same thing, right? Wrong. If you read carefully, you’ll
see that answer D is placing the DC in the wrong domain—XYZ.COM
instead of ABC.COM. So we can eliminate D, which leaves
the correct answers as C and E.
You can upgrade an NT 4.0 member server to
Win2K, but it’ll still be a member server. If you then
want to make it a DC, you must use DCPROMO—the AD Installation
Wizard—to take it to the next level. You see how tricky
Microsoft can be here.
Question No. 2
You are running a number of 32-bit and two 16-bit applications
called SWEET16.EXE and NOTSOSWEET16.EXE on a server called
MYCPUHURTS. To isolate the 16-bit applications from each
other, they were started in separate memory spaces using
the START command. You want to do some benchmark testing
of all user application processes by using system monitor.
You add all of the 32-bit applications instances to your
chart but you are not sure how to add the 16-bit processes.
How do you accomplish this?
- Add the SWEET16 and NOTSOSWEET16 instances
for the % Processor Time counter for the Process object.
- Add the NTVDM, SWEET16 and NOTSOSWEET16
instances for the % Processor Time counter for the Process
object.
- Add only the NTVDM instance for the %
Processor Time counter for the Process object.
- Add the NTVDM1 and NTVDM #2 instances
for % Processor Time counter for the Process object.
Question No. 2 Analysis
I know what you’re thinking. Why don’t those 16-bit
applications just go away? Who runs 16-bit apps anymore
anyway? Well, Microsoft seems hell-bent on making sure
you understand the problems with their evil little offspring.
If you’re an NT 4.0 MCSE, you should be able to answer
this question fairly easily. If you’re new to the field
and don’t harken back to the days of daily—sometimes hourly—GPFs
and OS reboots (No, I’m not referring to Windows 95, but
its ancestor Windows 3.1.), let me fill you in. In the
beginning, 16-bit applications ran on top of Windows 3.1,
Windows 3.1 ran on top of DOS, DOS barely ran at all,
and things were not good.
Then Windows NT came along. Windows NT and
2000 support 16-bit apps by simulating the old days—in
other words, 16-bit apps run in a simulated Windows 3.1
environment called WOW (which some claim stands for Windows
3.1 Only Worse), which in turn runs in a simulated DOS
environment called NTVDM. When you run multiple 16-bit
apps on Windows NT 4.0, they’re all forced into the same
virtual world, meaning there’s one WOW on top of one NTVDM.
When you run them in separate memory spaces, each has
its own little simulated world, namely NTVDM and NTDM#1.
When you’re monitoring these applications, you can’t monitor
them directly, but instead must monitor the simulated
world in which they run. Therefore, D is the correct answer.
Question No. 3
You are managing a Windows 2000 Active Directory domain.
The domain contains a mixture of Windows NT 4.0 client
computers and Windows 2000 Professional client computers.
You create an NT 4.0 system policy and place it on the
Windows 2000 Server computer that holds the FSMO role
of PDC emulator. The system policy denies users access
to Network Neighborhood. You then install Terminal Services
on one of the Windows 2000 servers and Terminal Services
client software on all of the client computers. You find
that Terminal Services clients can still browse the network
when they open My Network Places in their terminal session.
What should you do to prevent all users
from browsing the network?
- Copy the NTCONFIG.POL file to all client
computers.
- Edit the local registry on each client
computer to deny access to My Network Places.
- Create a Windows 2000 Group Policy that
denies access to My Network Places.
- Modify the Windows NT .ADM file so that
user access is restricted to both My Network Places
and Network Neighborhood. Place the system policy file
on the terminal server.
Question No. 3 Analysis
You definitely have to know how policies work in an AD
and NT 4.0 domain to answer this question, so let’s start
with the basics. In an NT 4.0 domain, you can set policy
restrictions for client computers by using a policy file
called NTCONFIG.POL. You create this file, set the policies
in it and then copy it to DCs for NT 4.0-based clients
to download. Even if all your DCs are Win2K-based, you
can still copy the NTCONFIG.POL file to them and restrict
your NT 4.0 computers. Win2K client computers, however,
don’t read NT 4.0 system policies, but instead read and
apply Win2K Group Policy.
The problem here is that although the NT
4.0-based computers don’t have access to Network Neighborhood
to browse the network (because of the restrictions in
NTCONFIG.POL), they’re browsing the network through their
terminal server session. Since the terminal server is
a Win2K computer, it stands to reason that users are using
it as a back door to browse because the terminal server
itself isn’t applying the restrictive policy. All of the
Win2K client computers can browse regardless if they’re
in a terminal session or not because NT 4.0 system policy
simply doesn’t apply to them. To solve this problem, set
restrictions for the Win2K computers (including the terminal
server) through an AD Group Policy that disables My Network
Places. Thus, answer C is correct.
The Win2K Server exam is on par with the
Win2K Professional exam in level of difficulty, but raises
the bar by increasing the amount of technical content
you must absorb in preparation for the exam. If you’ve
passed the Professional exam, you’re well on your way
to passing Server, since much of the content’s repeated.
But you’ll have to beef up on the server-specific topics
mentioned previously. Also, don’t be surprised if Microsoft
throws you a teaser question here and there from the other
core exams. Finally, use your test taking skills to maximize
your test question/answer analysis, as some of those questions
are just downright tricky.
About the Author
James Carrion, MCM R2 Directory, MCITP, MCSE, MCT, CCNA, CISSP has worked as a computer consultant and technical instructor for the past 16 years. He’s the owner of and principal instructor for MountainView Systems, LLC, which specializes in accelerated Microsoft Certification training.